The video of Venker’s interview with Fox & Friends is now available online from here. She seems to have backtracked on her earlier article; she’s not advocating traditionalism at all, just a kinder slavery of men.
She did not do a shout-out to the manosphere as some thought she might.
Second, she looks like a typical ballbuster. The short, masculine haircut, business-like button-up shirt, and hard, unpleasant expression. She does not seem like the type of feminine women you’d hope for from someone arguing that women are becoming less feminine.
She doesn’t seem to be agreeing with us, but rather seems to be suggesting, as Dalrock has written, that men should be women’s servants, but treated a little bit better so they remain compliant servants.
The male host said almost nothing, but what little he did say was generally good.
Also, take a look at the hamster running itself ragged in the female host:
3:15 – Angry women angrily talks about women not being angry: Makes Venker’s point.
5:04 – She argues her kids and marriage are the most important things in her life; which is why she abandons them to work.
6:10 – She asks: Could it be that women are angry because they’re taking on masculine roles, but men don’t desire to take on feminine roles?