NYT Tries to Have a Pregnant Women Murdered

Jim has noted that two NYT journalists published Darren Wilson’s home address so the Ferguson mob can lynch him and kill his pregnant wife.

In response, common citizens can help show them not to wage war on us. I do not have a big a platform as the NYT but I can help boost the signal. Here is the information on the two responsible for doxing Officer Wilson:

Julie Bosman
5620 N Wayne Ave Apt 2
Chicago, IL 60660-4204
Cook County
Twitter
Work Phone: 312-552-7204
Mobile: 646-753-2052

Campbell Robertson
1113 N Dupre St
New Orleans, LA 70119-3203
Orleans County.
Twitter

If you’re ever in either neighbourhood, why don’t you stop by and say hello.

35 comments

  1. Come on man. We’re not called to fight evil with evil. I’d advise taking this down.

    Matthew 5:43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 so that you may [ap]be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 If you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? 48 Therefore [aq]you are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

  2. No Don’t take it down!

    These two NYT reporters are evil scum. On the other hand the publication of their addresses and contact information gives them a taste of their own medicine.

  3. Don’t take it down. For one thing, this most likely won’t lead to any flash mob against them, unfortunately.

    In any event, I no longer believe in handicapping ourselves by playing fair or nice. This is tribal 4gw and the other side has made it quite clear that they will do anything, no matter how underhanded, to advance their tribe. It is time to start doing the same. Take nothing off the table.

  4. I’ve said it before, but systems need developing so that costs are imposed on journalists (and editors) engaging in behavior like this. If you’re going to tie your hands when being attacked, then you are done.

  5. doxing the doxers sounds like a beautiful trend. great job FN! but imHo this would be better circulating ‘virally’ through semi-anon social media like twitter rather than at one site that can be conveniently attacked by the powers that be. 2 cents, etc.

  6. Apparently, I didn’t include enough of the sermon on the mount:

    Matthew 5:38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.’ 39 But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. 40 If anyone wants to sue you and take your [am]shirt, let him have your [an]coat also. 41 Whoever [ao]forces you to go one mile, go with him two. 42 Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you.

    Are we Christians but in name only and when it comes time to walk the walk we do the evil that everyone else is doing? It’s cliche but is this something that Jesus would do?

  7. Good post Free, don’t take it down. Weakness never wins and the Almighty God is the God of War showing little to no mercy when at war

  8. @ Info

    This is not vengeance. This is self-defense.

    Self defense is doing that which is legal under the law. Last time I checked, doxxing for malicious intent is illegal.

    Not to mention maliciousness/enmities are not exactly one of the fruits of the Spirit.

    Galatians 5:16 But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not carry out the desire of the flesh. 17 For the flesh [g]sets its desire against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; for these are in opposition to one another, so that you may not do the things that you [h]please. 18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the Law. 19 Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: [i]immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20 idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, [j]factions, 21 envying, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these, of which I forewarn you, just as I have forewarned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.

    G2189 — ἔχθρα — echthra — ekh’-thrah
    Feminine of G2190; hostility; by implication a reason for opposition: – enmity, hatred.

    There’s no other way to spin it. It’s illegal which is also against the Scriptures, but it is not walking according to the Spirit.

  9. @DS:

    Doxing with publicly available information is not illegal. It is only illegal if it involves stalking, hacking, or the like.

    Second, I did not call for any evil actions and, unlike doxing Darren Wilson, nothing evil will come of this. There is no mob baying for these people’s blood. At worst, they might lose there jobs (which would be only justice after such a breach of journalistic ethics and basic morality), receive an angry letter or phone call, or maybe have someone say knock on their door and express disapproval. None of which would be unjust or vengeance. No one is going to commit an evil action like firebomb their house or shoot them up, because rightests are still civilized.

    I don’t think there was any evil done here. I am simply showing reporters that there information is out there to and disapproval can be expressed towards them.

  10. I don’t have a problem with what you’ve done here, Free, but then I am a fallen sinner like the rest of us, and I won’t add lying to my list of sins and deny that I enjoy schadenfraude of the SJW – Progressive-leftists getting a dose of their own medicine.

    While I like Deep Strength’s quoting of the sermon on the mount, I think Jesus’ warning about living and dying by the sword are applicable here. Hope you’re own private life is aligned so that you can handle being doxxed yourself.

  11. Self defense is doing that which is legal under the law.

    Jesus broke the law of his time when he refused to follow the Traditions of the Elders enforced by the Sanhedrin.

    In many states, defending yourself from violence is also illegal.

    Self defense is the actions of defending your human rights derived from God. The legality of exercising this right is a non sequitur.

  12. The holiness posturing from Deep Strength is palpable. Holiness competitions will win you no points here.

    “Don’t stoop to their level” is effectively “hold still while they punch you in the balls”.

  13. @ KG: I’m fairly open with my opinions in real life; there is not much on here that I have not stated to my friends or family and no one I know well would be surprised by any of it. Anonymity is more a convenience than a necessity.

    The only two things I really would be worried about are:

    First my job which is a rather comfortable one and the discomfort of losing it does frighten me. But, honestly, I sometimes wish I would lose it simply to motivate me out of my comfortable life to actually accomplish other things of value. I don’t have a family to support, so it’d be inconvenient and the first couple years would be rough, but I’d survive and probably be a better man for it.

    The second is potential future wives who might be driven off by googling me and reading my harsh rhetoric before getting to know me, but if she was meant to be, she’d be fine with what I have written. I have also grudgingly accepted that marriage might not be in my future.

    So, while I have some primal fears of being doxed and losing my material comforts, on a rational level I’m not overly worried; I’d probably be better off in the long run if I was doxed.

  14. Deep Strength,

    You ask what would Jesus Christ do to two that had conspired to murder a woman with child? If I remember my lessons from the Bible,it involves casting them into the fires of Hell to be destroyed. As I am not the Lord, I do not presume his place of eternal judgement, but you asked.

    Temporally, the mob is the law. What is written means nothing to the authorities,as they themselves call the mob to enact their wills. Authority is held by the loudest cry and the largest crowd. Get enough people together,and you will have the law.

    The Shadowed Knight

  15. As I always say Christians don’t want to win, they want to sit around and wait for God to show up and fix their problems for them

  16. Curious: when you say “wage war on us,” who is “us?”

    As far as content, it’s an interesting way to immediately show the consequences of one’s actions. I don’t know if they were trying to prove something, or totally oblivious of their responsibilities. But any harm to Wilson would be on their conscience.

    Similarly, if anything were to happen to them, I would hope people who posted their addresses go further than a “serves you right” attitude.

  17. @ PG: Us is the vaisyas, the middle/working class whites.

    We do have nasty hate speech laws, but they tend to pick their targets and have recently been defanged, to a degree. I’m not overly worried as I’m not really much of a target for a shakedown.

  18. @ FN

    Thanks for clarifying your intent. Though, perhaps the golden rule also from the sermon on the mount may change your mind:

    Matthew 7:12 “In everything, therefore, treat people the same way you want them to treat you, for this is the Law and the Prophets.

    @ KG

    Jesus broke the law of his time when he refused to follow the Traditions of the Elders enforced by the Sanhedrin.

    In many states, defending yourself from violence is also illegal.

    Self defense is the actions of defending your human rights derived from God. The legality of exercising this right is a non sequitur.

    Different scenario as the Sanhedrin was a religious authority. The Pharisees claimed that their tradition was God’s law. For example, Matthew 15, Mark 7:

    Matthew 15:1 Then some Pharisees and scribes *came to Jesus from Jerusalem and said, 2 “Why do Your disciples break the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat bread.” 3 And He answered and said to them, “Why do you yourselves transgress the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? 4 For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother,’ and, ‘He who speaks evil of father or mother is to [a]be put to death.’ 5 But you say, ‘Whoever says to his father or mother, “Whatever I have that would help you has been [b]given to God,” 6 he is not to honor his father or his mother[c].’ And by this you invalidated the word of God for the sake of your tradition.

    Jesus “broke the law” of the Pharisees because they were supposed to be righteous. Additionally, when they claimed their law was God’s law they placed themselves under the judgment of the Father and Jesus.

    In regard to obeying earthly authorities it is pretty clear via Romans 13, Hebrews 13, and 1 Peter 2 that we are to obey earthly laws.

    @ TSK, ton, etc.

    I trust what God says.

    Romans 12:19 Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,” says the Lord. 20 “But if your enemy is hungry, feed him, and if he is thirsty, give him a drink; for in so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.” 21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

  19. Deep Strength is a concern troll. And he also demonstrates how progressivism arose from Christianity.

  20. The reason why people like us lose is because we listen to people like Deep Strength.

    “The holiness posturing from Deep Strength is palpable. Holiness competitions will win you not points here.

    ‘Don’t stoop to their level’ is effectively ‘hold still while they punch you in the balls'”.

    Exactly.

    The jewish owned New York Times wants the blacks to do the dirty work for them.

  21. Us is the vaisyas, the middle/working class whites.

    You’re naive if you believe there’s not a war being waged on the working class as a whole, not just whites. The reason why “they” are winning is because they’ve divided and pitted you guys against each other.

    Similarly, I’m naive for believing this is different from the typical us-vs-them race-driven manosphere blog.

  22. Ooh, racist! We’ve been called racists!

    We’re not conservatives who serve as the outer party, to grovel and beg for forgiveness when someone calls us an -ist word, thank you very much.

  23. You’re either reading impaired, or you’re too dense to delineate what I actually said.

    If it’s the former, I’ll clue you in that not once did I say (or imply) FN is racist. Hit ‘cntrl + F’ and see for yourself. Also note that the unnecessary obsession with race (hence ‘race driven’) doesn’t make one a racist.

    On the other hand, if you’re too dense to understand this, I have no interest in continuing this conversation with you.

Leave a Reply