On the Christianization of game.
The godly masculinity compendium.
Six habits that make you a man.
Only speak when you have something of value to add.
Dominance is not something to be turned on and off at will.
If you’re failing to find a mate, deal with your one obvious problem.
Related: You have bigger things to work on then game.
Related: Game starts from vulnerable beginnings.
Life on hard mode.
Related: Understanding the world and the mission.
Why patriarchy is the greatest social system ever created.
Related: Mating disruption.
The importance of the old testament patriarchs.
Related: False teachings around humility.
Never beg, never plead.
Related: Guard your strength.
Related: Don’t try to placate her emotions, bring her closer to God.
Related: The socialization of men and women.
3 ways a Christian woman can help herself be attracted to a Christian man.
Related: Looks have nothing to do with women being unable to “find” husbands.
Related: A woman can know a player as he is that perfect boyfriend she’s been searching for.
Confusing value and attraction.
Best way to survive a street fight? Don’t start one.
Neoreaction vs. the manosphere.
Manosphere vs. neoreaction commentary.
Related: The manosphere and reactionaries should get along.
Related: Defending the manosphere.
Reaction does nothing; there is little to be done as our path is more or less inevitable. We are pointing out error so that restoration can take place when the inevitable occurs.
Neoreaction is diagnostics not advocacy. Entryists can be seen because they are lying.
The point of a monarch is not to rule. The absolute monarch fills the highest position of authority, so no one else can. The monarch dicking around instead of ruling is a positive, not a negative.
That Adam Gurri guy just made his piece on neoreaction.
Hierarchy is kinder to the poor than equality.
Related: Thinking people are equal will create more inequality.
Related: Wright questioning modern feudalism.
Magic: more real than you think.
The leftist is defined by his unyielding despair.
Feminist having problems with the leftist singularity. You’d think she’d have some self-awareness.
Related: Will Wheaton can never appease the gods of equality.
Related: The left continues to eat its own.
Our civilization is not guaranteed; it lives by an edge.
A nice example of the Cathedral spin machine in action.
Discrimination against conservatives in social psychology.
How anti-nazi activity creates nazi signalling.
Here Mark Shea commits the association fallacy. Movin’ on up in his criticisms of neoreaction.
Swiss citizenism and American racialism.
Related: Vox comments on the Swiss vote.
Catholic social teaching and economics.
Advertising, individuality, consumerism, and feminism.
Three articles from the NYT; is there an opinion shift in the making?
The NYT reconsiders equal marriages.
The NYT on how the modern sexual culture destroys love.
The NYT realizes that single motherhood hurts children.
Related: The continued decline of the NYT.
Despite the typo, I made one of the top 15 #backtothekitchen tweets.
Related: Both sexes need to work to make traditional sex roles workable.
Related: 10 changes that need to happen to do so.
Related: The 20 articles of traditional sex roles week.
Related: To cook is to love.
Related: 9 ways a woman can make herself more attractive.
The negative effects of fatherlessness can’t be attributed solely to poverty.
Science: Sex differences in the brain.
Feminism is simply “I want”.
Related: The “I need feminism” hall of fame.
60% of working moms would work less if they could afford to.
Science: Equality and feminism are a female mating strategy.
A timeline for women who want to have it all.
A fun Christian hamster on divorce.
The hamster is strong in Jenny Erickson: She slept around before marriage, so it’s the churches fault she’s divorced.
Related: A manosphere cliché.
The difference between an intelligent woman and a smart woman.
Matt doxxes Cynthia Gockley, whose been stalking manospherians.
A story of a man at retirement.
Seems the MGTOW forum went down.
How long until paternity tests lead to cries of “paternalism”?
Related: An advance in male birth control.
Remember, alimony is evil when women have to pay it.
“Bright girls believe that their abilities are innate and unchangeable, while bright boys believe that they can develop ability through effort and practice.”
Dear E-Harmony, fuck you. Hilarious.
Kipling’s Cold Iron. Haven’t read this one before; excellent.
Why all the self-esteem talk? Nihilism.
Welfare stories; the lie no one prefers welfare to work.
Some rules for obeying your minority masters.
Why are we so unhappy when we have so many good things?
Some basic advice on discharging student loans.
The wired man’s burden.
When FDR betrayed his allies.
More Obamacare stupidity in the USSA.
Karl Marx was insane, but people are even more insane for listening to him.
NAACP demands photo ID for those attending protest against photo ID laws.
A convenient fire in Argentina.
Slate notices some conservatives are opposed to expanding voting.
(H/T: Outside In, RPR, Anissimov, SDA, Isegoria)
Thanks for the linkage my good sir.
Thanks for the links. Looks to be some good reading this week.
Thanks!
BTW, no pingbacks with the new URL?
I only found that you’d linked me via reading this, not through a pingback held in moderation.
Thanks for the linkage. Assimov is picking fights to bolster his NRx “spokesman” cred. He tried to play it later like he was just trolling. He has done this with multiple groups recently.
Thanks for the links!
“Assimov” What a pun… L.O.L… Why are you so sore, degenerate P.U.A.?
“Game” is for pagans… Where power is the only thing deemed worthy of worship.
J.P.O.
Thanks for the linkage and I like the new look.
” there is little to be done as our path is more or less inevitable. We are pointing out error so that restoration can take place when the inevitable occurs.”
Yup – IMHO we could sum up the Christian reactionary position towards ‘action’ in the following way:
Due to a wide variety of factors [total liberal poltical, media, educational, financial hegemony among them], and evidenced by a variety of historically analogous occurrences, the inertia behind the progressive/secular forces is simply way too strong to contest – we are approaching a leftist singularity, and the outcome can only go one way. However, leftism, like all evils, contain within it the seed of its’ own destruction.
Rather than expend our forces trying to stop that which no force on earth could stop, and what will eventually kill itself anyway, we instead wish to shelter and to preserve whatever is still remaining from our Christian traditional past, so when the time comes to rebuild, we have the tools, strength, and knowledge to do so.
IMHO, reactionaries need to focus on this sheltering and preservation…we don’t need more articles cataloging how messed up our society is…they are getting repetitive, and anyone with any inkling of truth knows this already.
As men, we need to do more than just talk about what is wrong – we need to take what actions we can, and I hope that future reactionary writing can focus more on that.
Debating with non-reactionaries is useless (witness the otherwise respectable Vox and his army of commenters go full retard against the Dark Enlightenment, for example) so we need to gather what forces we have and focus on keep faith and tradition alive and concern ourselves with that tiny remnant that does adhere to the truth.
Y’all are welcome.
Will: Pingbacks should be working. I rechecked the box, so hopefully that fixes it.
lolz: Exaclty, we need to preserve what we can, so its there when we need it.
Curious; it didn’t work.
Nice new digs.
As for the Reaction doing nothing, I had to read more before I finally found I agreed. We’re past the cultural tipping point. No amount of expertly-penned documents or thoughtful discourse can turn the tides back. We’re headed for a hard reset.
The ironic thing is that Marxism will end up cannibalizing itself. It’s power comes from using the system installed by reactionaries (order, virtue, etc.) to play a loaded game wherein they can use force via government to impose their will on the populace until the actual populace is changed to reflect it. The problem is that when order finally decays (as Marxism actively tries to undermine it), we’re living in a world of force. And Reactionaries tend to be built or war.
I was reading something (I can’t remember for the life of me where) about the development of monarchies and aristocracies was a system where reactionaries obtained supreme power and installed order over the chaos by conquering it and subjugating it. We’re heading back into that territory again.