Another long Lightning Round today.
Roissy talks on post-scarcity; he’s not positive on it.
Aurini exposes the idiocy of mainstream discussion on demographics.
Patriactionary has a great list of quips.
Athol explains why men running the MAP have power.
Vox explains why most wives shouldn’t worry about that power and why it’s tragic when older women divorce; it’s kind of touching.
Dicipres finds a couple neat studies.
Dogsquat has a good post on the starter version of the approach attitude.
Forney points out the obvious; game’s pointless if you’re a loser.
The Last Psychiatrist explains how self-loathing protects you from stopping being a loser.
The Poet argues against “enjoying the decline”. Wonder how the Captain will respond?
Frost has a post on his father that is both touching and heartrending.
Related: Walsh shows very clearly how important fathers are.
Glorious Bastard asks what is a women?
Meanwhile, Wintery Knight discusses how feminists want to dominate men.
Related: If a feminist makes poor choices and regrets them the next day, the man should be punished.
A feminist admits there’s no war on women because, get this, not all women are the same. My question: why haven’t anti-abortionists started a “war on babies” meme? It seems like it could be effective.
Gender “equality” creates economic “inequality”.
Britain takes a pro-fatherhood stance on family law. Seems MRA’s have had some impact.
The atrocity you’ve never heard of; when the allies forcibly migrated conquered foes and forced them into slave labour.
Fox has some good news on the black community. If more of them escape the hell of public schooling, there might be some improvement in their lot.
Related: Bribing the natives not to destroy their own homes.
When diversity hurts those it supposedly helps.
A discussion on measuring happiness. It’s good if you can get over the overly flowery language.
Mainstream economists discovers the obvious.
Some (only some?) mainstream economists are stupid.
The young are the new helots. If they knew what was good for them, they’d join the Tea Party.
A libertarian wishlist.
Related: A nice bit of libertarian satire.
Related: Some people do not understand libertarianism at all.
If you want to remove the influence of money in politics, remove the power from politics.
Thanks for the linkage!
No problem; it was a good post.
What he said…. been meaning to drop in and thank you for the traffic for a while. Been swamped at work. Taken the red pill yet?
-Allen in Fort Worth
No problem. It’s slowly working it’s way down my throat.