As I’ve written, political power is, in essence, the capacity for violence and the will to use it. The power of a leader comes from his authority over, his ability to command, those with the capacity for violence because they believe he legitimately has authority to command them.
American politics, democratic politics, is a battle over who has authority and legitimacy to command violence of the democratic state and to what ends it may be commanded. These battles do not result in civil war because Americans accept that the democratic state, regardless of who holds the reins, is the legitimate authority over violence as long as the democratic process of transitioning this authority occurs in a mostly legitimate manner.
This legitimacy is crumbling.
Trust in American institutions is declining across the board. Trust in democracy is falling. The legitimacy of the process of authority transition is declining, with many thinking the process is rigged by, depending on the partisan side, illegal voting, foreign interference, gerrymandering, the electoral college itself, voter demographic changes, etc. A significant minority would theoretically support a military coup, while a significant minority currently support a legal coup by the deep state. (And this is only what people are willing to say, if a coup happened, far more would go along with it than would willingly say they’d theoretically support it).
The legitimacy of the democratic process is collapsing. If the legitimacy of the process collapses, so to does the legitimacy of the entire system who’s entire legitimacy and authority rests on the will of the people.
It is possible legitimacy could be earned back by the current system, but given the increasing diversity of America and the bifurcation of America between the Amerikaners and the urban cosmopolitans and their clients, it is unlikely, barring a Trumpian miracle.
Once legitimacy has faded, so to will authority. Power will be up for grabs.
With power struggles becoming viscerally real in a way democratic power papers over, legitimacy and authority will have to be reestablished.
The neoreactionary project is to establish legitimacy and authority in a peaceful way, to transfer legitimacy, authority, and power to an authoritarian autocrat with minimal bloodshed and without a descent into chaos.
Of course, the peaceful transfer of legitimacy, authority, and power itself requires a certain level of legitimacy, authority, and power.
Back to the beginning, power comes from the capacity and will for violence, it is essentially, ‘how many men with guns with how much morale and support equipment can I bring to bear should I call upon it?’
The capacity for violence doesn’t have to be used to exercise power but it has to exist and the will and authority to command it must be there.
This means that any person or group who wishes to reestablish legitimacy and authority after the terminal decay of current legitimacy and authority will require a base of power, a group of men willing to obey and, if necessary, commit violence on its behalf.
This includes the great man trying to establish the neoreactionary bargain or any other group trying to establish some form of right-wing authoritarianism.
The good news for for right-wing authoritarians is that there is a large, well-armed, pre-built power base waiting to be led: the middle-American radicals. As I wrote in my last post, the MARs are the largest single political group in the US but are also also one the politically least powerful.
The MARs are ineffective because they are leaderless. Trump is not of them and isn’t really leading them, but he’s sympathetic to them and appealling directly to them, which is the the most pro-MARS any political player has been since Buchanan last ran. The MARs propelled him to victory when his play to them was essentially: I don’t hate you, I think your concerns are legitimate, and I will work to address them. Given the vicious reaction from the current establishment that even this relatively minor level of play to the MARs base had, it is clear that in our current system the MARs are considered an illegitimate outgroup by the powers that be.
The MARs are effectively an occupied people ruled by an essentially foreign establishment. The Cathedral is run by people with different values who hate them, or at best condescend to them (“why don’t those rubes vote for their own best interests?”). Given the vicious reaction to Trump’s appeals to the MARs (and to the Tea Party and NRA), it is clear that the current American ruling structure will attempt to destroy any attempts by the MARs for democratic redress of their concerns. Their lot is to ground down for the system.
A large, alienated, armed, directionless, occupied group is sitting there waiting to be led. All that’s needed is to supply them with a leader, a will, a direction, and there will be a power base to reshape America.
The MARs are the obvious target group for any right-wing authoritarian action. They are patriotic and they are armed. They are increasingly desparate and not particularly ideological, meaning that someone willing and able to provide them the good governance they need will be able to create loyalty, legitimacy, and authority among them. Their attachment to democracy and the system that is destroying them, is not particularly strong and is weakening, leaving them open to more authoritarian froms of government.
Any populist right-wing movement, should be working to organize, radicalize, and mobilize the MARs, that’s where they will find fertile soil for any potential right-wing mass movement.
But, right-wing populism will likely not succeed. Every populist MARs uprising within the democratic framework, from McCarthy to Nixon’s silent majority to the Tea Party, has been either crushed or subverted. Hopefully, Trump will succeed, but the likelihood is he will at most buy a few more years until collapse, a few judges to protect MARs from leftist vengeance, and have prevented war with Syria, Iran, and Russia (which are certainly valuable in themselves, but are not going to change the tide we currently ride).
It also seems questionable whether a populist MARs movement outside a democratic framework will spontaneously arise. Despite the rhetoric, the MARs have proven to be overly long-suffering and law-abiding for us to expect 2nd amendment solutions in time for them to be effective. The current South African situation suggests that this long-suffering may last well beyond the point of no return.
Aside from concerns of feasibility, 2nd amendment solutions are something to be avoided if at all possible. Peaceful restoration is the goal, violent restoration, even if ultimately successful, is itself a partial failure, and there is a high probability of terminal failure should violent restoration be attempted.
Instead of populism, a better strategy is passivism. Build an elite class among the MARs, tap into existing MARs elites, and find allies with MARs-friendly elites, and build a network to create a leadership class the MARs will follow. Once this class has been built and has created the necessary legitimacy, a leader can be taken from it (or may arise spontaneously, as Trump did) and power can be peacefully transferred and restoration enacted.
Imagine what Trump could have done, could be doing, if, instead of having to rely on the deep state and eGOP to staff his administration and Twitter to spread his message, he had a ready built, legitimized set of loyal elites with a loyal power base to drop into any necessary role and have it spread their message. If, instead of having to spend most of his efforts on court politics and maintaining poll numbers, he could work at solving the US’ problems knowing his people were loyal to him and would support him.
He would be in a position to accept power and take upon himself the responsibility for restoration.
Given how much Trump has gained (or, perhaps more accurately, forestalled) with an isolated, hastily organized campaign filled with internal strife, working off little more than a single, fallible man’s charisma and ideas and a minor mobilization of MARs, think of how much could be accomplished if post-Trump, (2024, 2028, 2032), a true restorationist candidate ran an organized campaign centred around a well-led MARs power base fully organized and mobilized by a loyal, coordinated elite class with the purposeful intent of enacting restoration.
This would have a real chance of it being the true election that brings restoration. He would need to do little more than accept power.
Trump made the initial attempt at the Sailer strategy, he showed the way, now it needs to be fully adopted and implemented with the true election in mind.
The seed is there, among the MARs, who will grow it and pluck the fruit?
The seeds of a genuine and matured sovereign America have long germinated and they are not to be found in the Constitution with its feckless appeals to, “We the People…,” it isn’t in the Declaration of Independence with its juvenile, “…all Men are created equal…”, it’s not to be found in the inane ramblings of any Enlightenment philosopher, but rather in a less conceptual and more tangible tradition; the militia.
Militia, or the idea of it and the history of it, in conjunction with the 2nd amendment, is the most genuine expression of American sovereignty we have in our Tradition.
There’s certainly a sort of international malaise going on. People are dissatisfied, dissatisfied with life, with their jobs, with their country, with the things they see on the news. They feel powerless to change things, and the ‘old order’ insists by all their metrics things should be going well, but people don’t -feel- well.
Antidemocratic groups claim they can fix it, that if they can just implement their solution through total control, they can swiftly resolve the issue. That, of course, is as much a lie as it was in Nazi Germany. If only we can kill the Jews and Communists we can somehow get Germany back to its place of imperial glory!
That, of course, was nonsense. The Nazis set Germany back harshly and went for broke on deficit spending on their military to conquer their way out of debt. We could do the same thing now without breaking the bank, but it won’t solve the malaise.
-Why- do we have the malaise? That’s a million dollar question. Phones? 24hr News? Unresolved century of tension between nations begat by the atom bomb? Accelerationist changes to societal norms? Erosion of religion? Totally made up by manipulation by foreign powers that are -actually – not doing well like Russia and China?
Literally any of them could be it, but the question is ‘Why backslide?’
The things antidemocrats declare to be the problem aren’t necessarily the problem, but since the democrats can’t come with their own narrative on the problem to be solved, antidemocrats’ narrative is winning by default. Democratic leaders across the world -must- solve the messaging crisis and find a clear target to be solved to fix this malaise, even if it isn’t even necessarily going to solve the malaise, at least solving something gets wins and raises moods.